Russia Blamed for Massive Cyber Attack

February 21, 2020
3 mins read

The following is a summary of CNA key findings published in 2017:

–  Russian officials are convinced that Moscow is locked in an ongoing, existential struggle with internal and external forces that are seeking to challenge its security in the information realm. The internet, and the free flow of information it engenders, is viewed as both a threat and an opportunity in this
regard.

–  Russian military theorists generally do not use the terms cyber or cyberwarfare. Instead, they conceptualize cyber operations within the broader framework of information warfare, a holistic concept that includes computer network operations, electronic warfare, psychological operations, and information operations.

– In keeping with traditional Soviet notions of battling constant threats from abroad and within, Moscow perceives the struggle within “information space”
to be more or less constant and unending. This suggests that the Kremlin will have a relatively low bar for employing cyber in ways that U.S. decision makers
are likely to view as offensive and escalatory in nature.

– Offensive cyber is playing a greater role in conventional Russian military operations and may potentially play a role in the future in Russia’s strategic
deterrence framework. Although the Russian military has been slow to embrace cyber for both structural and doctrinal reasons, the Kremlin has signaled that it intends to bolster the offensive as well as the defensive cyber capabilities of its armed forces. During the contingencies in Georgia and Ukraine, Russia appeared to employ cyber as a conventional force enabler.

– The Georgia and Ukraine conflicts also provided opportunities for Russia to refine their cyberwarfare techniques and procedures and to demonstrate their capabilities on the world stage. These demonstrations may later serve as a basis to signal or deter Russia’s adversaries.

– Hacktivists and cyber-criminal syndicates have been a central feature of Russian offensive cyber operations, because of the anonymity they afford and the ease with which they can be mobilized. However, the crowd-sourced approach that has typified how the Kremlin has utilized hackers and criminal networks in the past is likely to be replaced by more tailored approaches, with the FSB and other government agencies playing a more central role.

 

Leave a Reply

Get updates

Join

We hate spams like you do

Latest comments

Previous Story

Huawei – “Trojan horses for Chinese intelligence” still welcomed

Next Story

Whitney Houston hologram tour is about to kick off

Latest from Georgia

Georgian economy sunk in 2020, Rating negative

RAEX-Europe confirmed the sovereign government credit ratings (SGC) of Georgia at ‘BB’ (Sufficient level of creditworthiness of the government) in national currency and at ‘BB’ (Sufficient level of creditworthiness of the government) in foreign currency. The rating outlook changed from stable to

British American Tobacco shuts its offices in Georgia

The FINANCIAL -- British American Tobacco plc (BAT)  an American British multinational company that manufactures and sells cigarettes, tobacco, and other nicotine products announced it will close its offices in Georgia from February 2021. 

Cross-Media Currency Becomes Reality With Nielsen One

THE FINANCIAL -- Company Plans to launch its single measurement solution in  Q4 2022. Nielsen (NYSE: NLSN) announced its plans to launch a single, cross-media solution to drive more comparable and comprehensive metrics across platforms. Nielsen’s transformative cross-media solution, called Nielsen ONE, will
Go toTop

Don't Miss